The Billionaire Class and Politics: Trump’s Second Inauguration & The Future of Democracy
For decades, presidential inaugurations were marked by tradition—an incoming president addressing the nation from the West Front of the U.S. Capitol, flanked by cabinet picks and esteemed political figures.
But 2025 was different.
Donald Trump’s second inauguration took an unprecedented turn, featuring a curated group of Big Tech billionaires front and center. The six most prominent figures in attendance collectively possessed a net worth exceeding the GDP of nations like Saudi Arabia and the Netherlands. To many, this glaring display of corporate wealth in politics signified a concerning trend: the White House aligning itself with billionaire elites over everyday Americans.
Public distrust regarding money in politics, corporate influence in government, and Big Tech’s role in democracy has been rising for years. The real question now is: Does this symbolize the erosion of democracy, where the wealthy set the agenda, or can reforms restore power to the people?
The Symbolism of the Inauguration Stage
Presidential inaugurations have historically taken place in various locations, including the White House, Senate chambers, and the House of Representatives. Since 1981, the West Front of The U.S.Capitol has served as the standard setting, offering a panoramic view of the National Mall meant to symbolize a direct connection between government and the people.
However, Trump’s 2025 inauguration broke tradition in more ways than one. While an unseasonably cold January forced the event indoors, what stood out was the intentional prominence of Big Tech moguls on stage. This wasn’t an accident—it was by design.
The decision was so disruptive that Senator Bernie Sanders took to X (formerly Twitter) to say:
“When I started talking about Oligarchy, many people didn’t understand what I meant. Well, that’s changed.”
The optics of this event reinforced concerns about corporate influence in governance, wealth inequality in politics, and the growing presence of tech billionaires in Washington—a longstanding debate surrounding the role of money in democracy.
Biden’s Farewell Warning vs. His Own Actions
Sanders wasn’t alone in his criticism. Outgoing President Joe Biden also issued a stark warning about the power of tech billionaires, drawing comparisons to President Eisenhower’s historic “military-industrial complex” speech.
In his farewell address, Biden cautioned:
“The free press is crumbling. Editors are disappearing. Social media is giving up on fact-checking. The truth is smothered by lies told for power and for profit.”
While Biden voiced concerns over misinformation, AI abuses, and corporate influence, his own administration had a history of appointing wealthy elites to key positions—including White House COVID-19 Coordinator Jeffrey Zients, worth an estimated $90 million.
This highlights a bipartisan issue: Both parties have fostered cozy relationships with corporate elites, raising concerns about who really influences American democracy.
The Bipartisan Wealth Boom in Politics
Historically, both Democrats and Republicans have benefited financially from their positions of power. Elected officials and political appointees alike have amassed considerable wealth while in office, often through questionable financial dealings.
Two well-publicized examples:
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas
- Accused of accepting luxury trips from billionaire Harlan Crow for over two decades—without disclosing them.
- Alleged ethics violations include undisclosed financial gifts and favors benefiting family members.
Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi
- Net worth skyrocketed from $60M to over $240M since 2009—a nearly fourfold increase.
- Faced scrutiny over suspect stock trades, allegedly benefiting from non-public government information.
- Linked to COVID-19 relief funds enriching a luxury hotel she owns.
These cases illustrate a larger systemic issue—one that goes beyond individual corruption. The real problem is a system that allows public officials to profit from political power.
The Root Cause—Money in Politics
Legendary comedian George Carlin once said:
“The real owners of this country are the big, wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians. They are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don’t. It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it.”
This sentiment resonates deeply today. According to a Pew Research Center poll (April 2024), only 22% of Americans trust the government to act in their best interests.
The 2020 Citizens United Supreme Court ruling removed spending limits on SuperPACs, allowing corporate money to dominate U.S. elections. The result? Dark money, secret donors, and billion-dollar campaigns that prioritize big donors over the electorate.
One major attempt to curb this influence was The McCain-Feingold Act (2002)—designed to restrict corporate-funded political advertising and unlimited contributions. However, court rulings and loopholes rendered it ineffective, allowing the cycle of money-driven politics to continue.
The real solution lies in systemic reform, including campaign finance reform, transparency laws, and grassroots activism.
FiNC’s Perspective—Fix the System, Not the Individuals
A well-known phrase says:
“Don’t hate the player. Hate the game.”
The issue isn’t about targeting individual politicians—it’s about fixing a system that rewards financial influence over public service.
What Can Be Done?
- Push for campaign finance reform
- Support grassroots activism & transparency laws.
- Demand accountability in corporate-political relationships.
- Vote for candidates committed to reducing corporate influence.
FiNC is committed to transforming politics by increasing accountability and transparency so that democracy serves the people—not billionaires. The fight for a fairer, more inclusive system starts now.
Join FiNC’s Meta-Movement today! Together, we can rebuild a democracy that works for everyone.
Sources